Stress fracture rehabilitation in Canberra.
Bone stress injuries need more than time off, they need a structured reloading program and an honest look at why the bone failed to keep up. Graded return to impact, running progression, and bone-health risk screening.
- Runners, defence & court sports
- High- vs low-risk site management
- Energy availability (REDs) screening
- Criteria-based return to impact
Understanding bone stress injuries.
A stress fracture is the end stage of a spectrum that starts with a bone stress reaction: repetitive load exceeding the bone's ability to remodel and repair. Common sites include the tibia, metatarsals, navicular and femur, and the site matters enormously, because some (like the anterior tibia or navicular) are high-risk for poor healing and need more conservative management.
Just as important as the injury is the reason it happened. Training-load spikes explain many cases, but under-fuelling relative to training (low energy availability, part of the REDs picture), low bone density, menstrual disturbance and certain medications all reduce the bone's capacity to adapt. A rehab program that ignores these misses the point, and invites the next one.
How we treat it.
Early management respects the healing bone: offloading as required for the site, while everything trainable stays trained, bike, pool, upper body and unaffected-limb strength work. As healing progresses we reintroduce load in stages: walking volume, then impact preparation (heavy strength work, hopping progressions), then a graded return-to-run program with explicit progression criteria.
In parallel we screen the 'why': training history, fuelling and energy availability, bone-health risk factors, and, where indicated, coordinate with your GP for bone density assessment and bloods. Progress letters keep your GP or specialist in the loop throughout.
Screening & risk review
- Training load & surface history
- Energy availability / REDs indicators
- Bone density & medical risk factors
- Coordination with GP for imaging & bloods
Return-to-load stages
- Offload & maintain fitness
- Progressive strength & impact prep
- Criteria-based graded return to run
- Prevention: load, fuelling, bone health
Funding: This program can be funded through NDIS (self- and plan-managed), DVA (D904 referral), Medicare CDM (GP care plan), Workers Comp/CTP, private health or self-pay. We confirm the right pathway at your first visit.
What the evidence says.
A stress fracture is a bone that lost the remodelling race, and the evidence says two things matter beyond the initial offloading: why it happened, and how you return. Risk factors are well established, rapid load increases, low energy availability and RED-S, vitamin D and calcium status, menstrual disruption in female athletes, and a return that simply waits out the pain without addressing them invites the next fracture. Graded reloading on a symptom guided timeline, with strength work throughout, is the standard of care, and high risk sites need specialist oversight.
How I treat it.
During the offload phase you keep training everything the fracture does not load, bike, pool, upper body, strength on the safe side, so fitness survives the healing. I screen the why properly, including energy availability and training history, and refer for medical workup where the pattern suggests it.
The return to running is written down, progressive and boringly disciplined: walk run progressions, load rules, and strength benchmarks before each step up. It is slower than people want and faster than a second fracture.
What we aim for.
- Healing protected while fitness is preserved
- The underlying cause found and fixed, not just the crack
- A written, graded return to full training
- One stress fracture, not a career of them
Frequently asked.
Related pages.
Recent literature behind this program.
A selection of the research and clinical guidelines that inform how this condition is managed at Fitness & Wellbeing Physiology.
- Hoenig T, Ackerman KE, Beck BR, et al. Bone stress injuries. Nature Reviews Disease Primers 2022;8:26.
- Mountjoy M, Ackerman KE, Bailey DM, et al. 2023 International Olympic Committee's (IOC) consensus statement on Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (REDs). British Journal of Sports Medicine 2023;57:1073–1097.
Evidence summaries are provided for information only and are not a substitute for individual clinical assessment.
Book your appointment.
Same-week availability for NDIS, DVA, CDM, CTP and private clients.
Prefer to call? 0418 153 608 · or email admin@fwphysiology.com